Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Gwen Stefani/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of songs recorded by Gwen Stefani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Carbrera (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets all required criteria. I would love any questions or comments. Thanks. Carbrera (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from SNUGGUMS
|
---|
That's about all from me Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|
I now support since things are looking better Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Aoba47
|
---|
|
This is the only comment that I have for the article. Other than that, I support this and believe it is ready to become a featured list. Make sure to update this when Stefani makes future releases as I have noticed a few articles similar to this fall behind. Aoba47 (talk) 05:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I fixed all of your concerns @Aoba47:. Thanks as always. Carbrera (talk) 22:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course. I am very impressed by the work put into this article. Aoba47 (talk) 23:10, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Did some script assisted fixes, and other than that no qualms at all. —IB [ Poke ] 13:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — Large comprehensive list, without any flaws I can find. Chrishonduras (talk) 03:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Everything looks great.
Just add a note or a key to explain what "TBA" stands for and why it has a blue background.--Cheetah (talk) 18:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Crzycheetah: I took your suggestion. Thanks for the feedback! Carbrera (talk) 02:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC).[reply]
- Support this candidate. TheKaphox (talk) 22:24, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Mymis
|
---|
Mymis
The article is well-referenced and well-written. Once these minor comments are addressed, will be happy to support it. Mymis (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply] |
- @Mymis: I addressed both issues. Thanks for your comments. Carbrera (talk) 20:52, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Very good, you have my support; great work! Mymis (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support The list is well-written, has a table that is easy to read, and the above issues have been addressed. Good job! Erick (talk) 23:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delegate note to reviewers: (pinging @Chrishonduras, TheKaphox, and Magiciandude: specifically so they see it) - This list is pretty solid, from a brief glance. That said, bare reviews like "Looks great, support!" are generally discounted by delegates because they give the impression that the reviewer did not read the list in detail, and it actually hurts the nomination because it leads more in-depth reviewers to avoid the nomination because the count is high. I'm not saying that you didn't review properly- like I said, there aren't any glaring errors in this list. But we have had issues at FLC before specifically with discography lists with large numbers of supports for lists that later reviewers find major issues with, so when I saw that this nomination has 8 supports- double the next highest nom- I wanted to make sure that everyone understands that reviews need to be substantive, not just a vote. --PresN 16:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Source review
[edit]Conducting it since one has been requested at the top of WP:FLC:
- Formatting:
since you are linking publishers only on earliest instance, you should de-link Billboard from ref 26 and any other/s I have missed. - Spot-check: ref 1-5, and a few others here and there. No issues.
- Completeness: check.
- No dead links.
Impressive work. – FrB.TG (talk) 13:11, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @FrB.TG: Thanks! Fixed the issue above! Carbrera (talk) 02:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Perfect! FrB.TG (talk) 05:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.